Home › Micro Harvesting System › Governance Hub
Visual articulation of the Non-Action Principle, affirming that deliberate inaction is a valid, disciplined governance decision within Micro Harvesting.📘 Non-Action Is a Valid Action Principle
Policy Name: Non-Action Is a Valid Action Principle
Version: v1.0
Status: ✅ LOCKED
Effective Date: December 21, 2025
Applies To: Micro Harvesting Portfolio (all strategies, levels, and operating states)
1. Purpose
This principle governs the intentional acceptance of inaction as a legitimate, rule-compliant portfolio decision within the Micro Harvesting system.
Its objectives are to:
-
Eliminate action bias and forced trading
-
Protect capital from low-quality decisions
-
Reinforce discipline during quiet or uncertain periods
-
Normalize patience as a core operating behavior
-
Preserve psychological and operational stability
Inaction is a decision, not a failure to decide.
2. Definition of Valid Non-Action
Valid Non-Action is defined as:
The deliberate choice to refrain from trading or reallocating capital when no rule-defined condition for action is present.
Non-action is intentional, not accidental.
3. Governing Principles (Non-Negotiable)
-
Action requires eligibility; inaction requires none.
-
Absence of opportunity is not a problem to be solved.
-
Capital protection precedes capital deployment.
-
Waiting is a strategy when governed by rules.
-
Silence after review is compliance.
4. Situations Where Non-Action Is Mandatory
Non-action shall be treated as the correct response when:
-
Harvest thresholds are not met
-
No stock qualifies for promotion or demotion
-
Deployment targets are within acceptable ranges
-
Volatility is insufficient or non-directional
-
SUNSET or buffer capital requires no intervention
Acting under these conditions constitutes rule violation.
5. Relationship to Cash and Undeployed Capital
Undeployed capital is:
-
A structural buffer
-
A source of optionality
-
A volatility absorber
Cash is not “idle.”
Cash is deployed for flexibility.
6. Interaction With Harvesting and Levels
Non-action reinforces:
-
The Harvesting Policy by preventing premature exits
-
The Level system by resisting emotional promotions or demotions
-
The Steady-State Harvest Concept by maintaining calm operation
Inaction is the default state between governed actions.
7. Prohibited Interpretations
The portfolio manager shall not interpret non-action as:
-
Missed opportunity
-
Lack of conviction
-
Underperformance
-
Indecision
-
Need for system modification
These interpretations introduce action bias.
8. Behavioral Safeguards
The portfolio manager shall not:
-
Create trades to feel productive
-
Lower thresholds to justify action
-
Substitute analysis for execution urgency
-
Treat boredom as a signal to intervene
Boredom is often evidence of discipline.
9. Relationship to Other Governance Protocols
This principle operates in conjunction with:
-
Harvesting Policy v1.0
-
Steady-State Harvest Concept
-
Micro Harvesting Portfolio Structure Rule
-
Removal Is Neutral Principle
-
Quarterly Reset & Capital Containment Rule
In case of conflict:
-
Governance rules override emotional impulse.
10. Meta-Rule
If no rule is triggered,
the correct action is to do nothing.
Change Log
-
v1.0 — December 21, 2025
Initial codification and lock-in of the Non-Action Is a Valid Action Principle.
Home | About Us | Contact Us | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Disclaimer





No comments:
Post a Comment