Sunday, January 19, 2025

Preparing for Week 4: Strengthening Downside Scenario Modeling and Volume Confirmation

Contents:

  • 1. Strengthening Downside Scenario Modeling
  • 2. Incorporating Volume Confirmation for Support & Resistance
  • 3. Tactical Adjustments to Trading Strategy
  • Final Takeaways for Week 4

As we move into Week 4 of live testing under the Budget Ethical Trading Account (BETA), our primary focus will be enhancing downside scenario modeling and incorporating volume confirmation for support and resistance levels. Week 3 highlighted critical areas where our trading strategy needed refinement, particularly in identifying weaker support levels and anticipating breakdowns more effectively. This post outlines key adjustments for Week 4 to improve execution and risk management.

A technical analysis chart for URC in Week 4, highlighting key resistance at 71.50, support at 67.00, stop-loss at 65.50, and a bargain price entry at 60.00, with volume analysis to confirm trade decisions.

Week 4 BETA Trading Scenario for URC: Key Support, Resistance, and Risk Management Strategy



1. Strengthening Downside Scenario Modeling

Lessons from Week 3:

  • Our expectation of 77.07 as a strong support level did not hold, leading to a significant price breakdown.

  • We lacked a structured downside contingency plan, resulting in an overly optimistic market expectation.

  • Stop-loss placement worked as intended but could be further optimized to allow tactical re-entries.

Week 4 Adjustments:

Model Multiple Downside Scenarios – Instead of relying on a single support level, we will create a tiered downside risk model based on past price action, volume shifts, and market sentiment. 

Define Alternative Support Zones – A structured approach will identify probable support levels at 67.00 (weak support), 65.50 (hard stop), and 60.00 (bargain entry). 

Tactical Stop-Loss Adjustments – Stops will be refined to protect capital while allowing flexibility for tactical re-entries if strong reversal signals appear.


Simulated Downside Scenarios & Tiered Support Modeling

We will now analyze three potential bearish scenarios to test our model’s response under different market conditions.

🔻 Scenario 1: Gradual Sell-Off & Controlled Decline

  • URC price slowly declines toward 67.00 with low-to-moderate selling volume.

  • At 67.00, if volume remains weak, we assume that the support level will not hold.

  • Price continues drifting downward, hitting 65.50, triggering our hard stop-loss.

  • If selling pressure persists, URC approaches 60.00, where we reassess for a re-entry opportunity.

Trade Action:

No entry at 67.00 without volume confirmation.

🚨 Exit at 65.50 if downtrend continues.

Consider tactical re-entry at 60.00 only if reversal patterns emerge.


🔻 Scenario 2: High-Volume Breakdown Below 67.00

  • Price reaches 67.00 but with high selling volume, confirming further downside pressure.

  • URC sharply declines to 65.50, showing no signs of reversal.

  • Further institutional selling drives the price toward 60.00 within a short period.

  • Support at 60.00 is tested, and volume increases significantly, signaling potential stabilization.

Trade Action:

No entry at 67.00 due to strong bearish momentum.

🚨 Wait for volume stability at 60.00 before considering an entry.

Look for a reversal candle (Green Elephant Bar) before re-entering.


🔻 Scenario 3: False Breakdown & Rapid Reversal

  • URC breaches 67.00 momentarily, triggering stop-losses from weak hands.

  • Suddenly, institutional buyers enter, reversing the price back above 67.00 with a strong green candle.

  • Buying volume spikes, and price recovers toward 71.50, testing resistance.

  • The stock consolidates between 67.00-71.50, forming a bullish structure.

Trade Action:

Enter at 67.00 if strong buying volume appears.

Hold position if recovery momentum continues.

🚨 Exit at 71.50 unless a confirmed breakout is supported by volume.


2. Incorporating Volume Confirmation for Support & Resistance

Lessons from Week 3:

  • Key support levels failed because volume did not confirm buyer strength.

  • High selling volume on January 14-16 reinforced the need for caution in calling support levels.

  • Resistance levels lacked momentum confirmation, making breakouts less likely.

Week 4 Adjustments:

Confirm Support & Resistance with Volume Trends – Any support level must be validated by higher-than-average buying volume. If price reaches support but volume remains low, we will delay entries to avoid premature positioning. 

Monitor Institutional Selling Pressure – Large-volume sell-offs indicate stronger bearish control. If institutions continue offloading shares at high volume, we will adjust our trading expectations accordingly. 

Use Volume to Confirm Breakouts – Instead of assuming resistance levels will break, we will wait for volume-backed moves above resistance before committing to breakout trades.


3. Tactical Adjustments to Trading Strategy

Key Level Week 3 Expectation Week 4 Assumptions and Revised Strategy
77.07 Expected strong support Removed as a key level; now an invalidated support
71.50 Resistance level Hard Resistance. Exit immediately on approach unless volume confirms strength.
67.00 Expected to hold Weak Support. Entry only if confirmed by Green Elephant Bar + volume increase
65.50 Not previously considered Hard Stop-Loss. New hard stop-loss to prevent deeper drawdowns. If price falls below this level, we exit entirely to limit losses.
60.00 Not previously considered Bargain Re-Entry. Strategic re-entry zone for bargain hunting. If the market experiences a deeper sell-off, this level may offer an ideal entry.

Final Takeaways for Week 4

Downside scenarios will be fully modeled, including tiered support levels.

Volume confirmation will be required for any support/resistance validation.

Stop-losses will be strategically adjusted for better tactical positioning.

Breakout expectations will be managed conservatively with volume analysis.

By implementing these refinements, we aim to make more data-driven trading decisions while reducing exposure to unnecessary risks. Week 4 will serve as a key test of our ability to adapt to changing market conditions effectively.

📢 Stay tuned for next week's trading recap and insights as we put these refinements into practice!


Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always do your own research before making any trading decisions.


Related Readings

Saturday, January 18, 2025

Week 3 Scenario Modeling Assessment for URC: Refining Our Predictive Skills

Contents:

  • 1. Comparing Our Week 3 Model vs. Actual Price Action
  • 2. What We Did Well in Week 3 Scenario Modeling
  • 3. Where We Can Improve Moving Forward
  • 4. Key Takeaways for Future Scenario Modeling
  • Conclusion: Building a More Adaptive Trading Approach

As we assess our scenario modeling performance for Week 3, it is important to evaluate how our projections aligned with actual market outcomes. By comparing our Week 3 Scenario Chart with the Week 3 Closing Chart, we can refine our predictive strategies and improve our execution in future weeks.

A technical analysis chart illustrating the Week 3 scenario model for URC, marking key support, resistance levels, and expected price movement.

Week 3 Scenario Model for URC: Projected Support, Resistance, and Market Movement Analysis

Universal Robina Corporation’s (URC) daily candlestick chart at the close of Week 3 on January 18, 2025, showing key price levels and trend analysis.

URC Daily Chart at Week 3 Close: Evaluating Market Movement as of January 18, 2025


1. Comparing Our Week 3 Model vs. Actual Price Action

🔹 Expected Scenario (Week 3 Model)

  • Probable Resistance: 80.70
  • Probable Support: 77.07
  • Target Breakout Zone: 85.00 (1/3 Zone)
  • Stop-Loss Adjustment: 73.80

Key Assumptions in Our Model: 

✅ We expected URC to consolidate around the 77.07 support level before attempting a move toward 80.70.

✅ We projected that, if momentum built up, a potential breakout towards 85.00 could occur.

✅ Our updated stop-loss of 73.80 was positioned to protect against downside risks while allowing price action to develop.


🔹 Actual Market Movement (Week 3 Closing Chart)

  • Closing Price: 68.60

  • Support Failed: Price dropped significantly below 77.07 and even the stop-loss at 73.80.

  • Bearish Momentum: URC fell sharply, breaching multiple support levels with increased volume.

  • Moving Averages: The 20-day MA (76.37) failed to provide support, confirming further bearish sentiment.

Key Observations from the Actual Price Action:

🔻 The expected support level at 77.07 did not hold—instead, a strong breakdown occurred.

🔻 Stop-loss positioning (73.80) was breached, confirming the importance of having a rigid risk-management system.

🔻 Bearish volume surged, indicating strong selling pressure rather than a recovery attempt.


2. What We Did Well in Week 3 Scenario Modeling

Incorporated Stop-Loss Adjustments: Our dynamic stop-loss strategy at 73.80 was a good move, as it prevented excessive drawdowns.

Plotted Probable Resistance & Support Correctly: While price did not respect support, the levels were based on valid historical price action.

Anticipated Key Market Zones: Our 1/3, 2/3, and 3/3 breakout zones correctly outlined potential bullish scenarios, even though the market ultimately moved in the opposite direction.


3. Where We Can Improve Moving Forward

🔸 1. More Focus on Downside Scenario Modeling

🔹 Our scenario focused heavily on a potential breakout but did not fully model a downside continuation scenario in the event of a breakdown.

🔹 Moving forward, we should build alternative scenarios that consider:

  • A breakdown below key support levels (like what happened this week).
  • Adjusting stop-losses dynamically based on trend weakness.
  • Identifying lower probability, high-impact events (like a major support breach).

🔸 2. Incorporate Stronger Volume & Trend Analysis

🔹 The Week 3 Closing Chart showed a strong increase in selling volume, signaling high conviction from sellers.

🔹 Our future models should incorporate volume analysis to confirm or invalidate price setups.

🔹 If volume is declining while price is testing support, it may be a better indicator that the level is weak, helping us adjust our trade plan.


🔸 3. Refine Tactical Entry & Exit Decisions

🔹 Given the level of volatility, we should explore smaller tactical entries first instead of assuming a full position at a key level.

🔹 Consider layering into positions based on confirmation signals (e.g., if support holds for multiple days rather than entering immediately).

🔹 Transaction costs must also be factored in when making rapid adjustments to positions. (Read More)


4. Key Takeaways for Future Scenario Modeling

Develop Multiple Scenarios – Avoid focusing too much on one primary expectation. Instead, create a bullish, neutral, and bearish model to prepare for any market movement.

Use Volume Confirmation – Support and resistance are only valid if volume confirms the level. Next time, check whether buying volume supports price action before committing to a trade.

Improve Stop-Loss Strategy – The hard stop-loss was effective, but a more dynamic approach (like a trailing stop) may help capture upside while protecting against deeper losses.

Adjust Trade Execution – Future models should factor in smaller position entries rather than assuming full exposure immediately.


Conclusion: Building a More Adaptive Trading Approach

Week 3 provided valuable lessons on scenario modeling, stop-loss placement, and volume analysis. While our upside expectations did not materialize, our risk management approach helped mitigate major losses. Moving forward, more robust alternative scenario modeling and volume-based confirmations will enhance our strategy.

🔔 Next Steps:

  • Improve downside risk scenario planning for better trade execution.

  • Adjust position sizing strategy to allow for tactical entries.

  • Use volume confirmation as a key factor in future market projections.

By refining these elements, our Week 4 model can become even more accurate and adaptable to market conditions! 🚀



Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always do your own research before making any trading decisions.


Related Readings

BETA Tracker Update – January 17, 2025: Live Testing Insights & Strategy Evolution

Contents:

  • Portfolio Performance Overview (January 17, 2025)
  • Portfolio Allocation & Trading Strategy
  • Key Lessons from Week 3 & BETA's Role in Refining Our Strategy
  • Key Takeaways & Next Steps for BETA
  • Conclusion

As we head into Week 3 of live testing our Modified 10-Step Trading Plan, we continue refining our trading strategy through our Budget Ethical Trading Account (BETA). This dedicated trading portfolio allows us to track our active trading results separately from our Micro Stock Trading Investment Portfolio, which maintains a mix of long-term investments and short-term trades.

Our journey began with the 8-Step Trading Plan, inspired by Oliver Velez, which served as our foundational trading structure. However, through daily trade analysis, we identified areas for improvement, leading to the evolution of the Modified 10-Step Trading Plan (Read More). Now, with BETA in place, we can fine-tune our strategies under real market conditions and adjust as needed.




AS OF: JANUARY 18, 2025
PORTFOLIO SUMMARY BETA
Inception Date: January 15, 2025
Initial Deposit: Php 15,000.00
Net Cash Flows: Php 21,228.38
Adjusted Principal Portfolio Value: Php 36,228.38
Starting Portfolio Value: Php 36,228.38
Ending Portolio Value: Php 35,977.93
Realized Gain/Loss: - Php 250.46
Percent Realized Gain/Loss: - 0.69%
PORTFOLIO ALLOCATION: 100%
     Universal Robina Corporation (URC) 22%
     RL Commercial REIT, Inc. (RCR) 17%
     Cash Balance 62%
DIVIDENDS: 0
     Universal Robina Corporation (URC) 0
     RL Commercial REIT, Inc. (RCR) 0
NUMBER OF TRANSACTIONS 13



Portfolio Performance Overview (January 15 to 17, 2025)

  • Initial Deposit: PHP 15,000.00
  • Net Cash Flows: PHP 21,228.38
  • Adjusted Principal Portfolio Value: PHP 36,228.38
  • Starting Portfolio Value: PHP 36,228.38
  • Ending Portfolio Value: PHP 35,977.93
  • Realized Gain/Loss: -PHP 250.46
  • Unrealized Gain/Loss: -0.69%

Portfolio Allocation & Trading Strategy

  • Universal Robina Corporation (URC): 22%
  • RL Commercial REIT, Inc. (RCR): 17%
  • Cash Balance: 62%

Key Lessons from Week 3 & BETA's Role in Refining Our Strategy

1. The Importance of Stop-Loss Adjustments in Live Trading

One of the biggest takeaways from Week 3 has been the need for a dynamic stop-loss setup in response to market volatility. Early on, we encountered significant price swings, reinforcing the importance of:
Hard Stop-Loss: A rigid, non-negotiable level that protects capital from deep drawdowns.
Dynamic Stop-Loss: A flexible approach that adapts to market conditions, helping us capture gains while managing risk.

Our experiences in Week 3 have shown that without proper stop-loss implementation, small trading accounts like BETA can quickly erode capital. (Read More)




2. Tactical Entries & Exits: Balancing Strategy with Transaction Costs

Another critical evolution in our trading approach has been refining tactical entries and exits, particularly when considering transaction costs. In smaller accounts, frequent trades can eat into profits, requiring a careful balance between execution and cost efficiency.

Key adjustments made in BETA:
Tactical Entries: Smaller, strategic positions placed at key market levels.
Core Positions: Longer-hold positions based on a strong technical setup.
Transaction Cost Consideration: Ensuring each trade has a sufficient risk-reward ratio to justify execution.

These refinements allow us to protect our trading capital while maintaining active market participation. (Read More)


Key Takeaways & Next Steps for BETA

1️⃣ Live Testing Validates Strategy Adjustments:

  • The Modified 10-Step Trading Plan has improved execution clarity by separating tactical trading (BETA) from long-term investments (Micro Stock Trading Investment Portfolio).

2️⃣ Stop-Loss Refinements Are Crucial for Small Accounts:

  • Hard stops protect capital, while dynamic stop-losses ensure we stay in profitable trades while reducing downside exposure.

3️⃣ Efficient Tactical Entries/Exits Are Necessary for Long-Term Growth:

  • Managing transaction costs and ensuring proper trade setups will be a continued focus in upcoming weeks.

Conclusion

The launch of BETA Trading Account in Week 3 marks an important milestone in our trading strategy evolution. By tracking our active trading activities separately, we can refine execution, manage risk, and optimize tactical trading without affecting long-term investment holdings.

As we move forward, our focus will be on adapting to market conditions while maintaining strict discipline in execution. The lessons learned in BETA will serve as the foundation for improving our overall investment approach in both trading and portfolio management.

📢 Stay tuned for next week's update as we continue refining our strategy in live market conditions!


Disclaimer: This post is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial advice. Always do your own research before making any trading decisions.


Related Readings

Featured Post

Stock Price Review: Wilcon Depot Inc. (WLCON) Daily Chart as of June 27, 2025 (Mid-Day) – Buy or Sell Decision Using the Hybrid 10-Step Strategy

WLCON breaks above ₱9.00 in mid-day trade on June 27, 2025. Hybrid 10-Step Strategy confirms hold with trailing stop and partial exit . 📅 P...